Monday, March 24, 2008

Enough Already, We Surrender - Senators Game Preview and Open Thread

I really don't know what we can do to change our luck against the Sens. Sens are 5-1 against us this year, and our only win was against a short-handed club, and we still had to hold on for dear life. The last game was a 3-0 pasting in Montreal where we were dominated in every aspect of the game. So that's it, we surrender. Sens are great, Habs suck. We freely admit we are not in your league, mighty Senators. You win. Our speed and power play are no match for your star-studded line-up, Wade Redden and questionable goaltending. We bow down to your brilliance. Have mercy on us.

Did that work? Let's hope. A quick set of bullet points to get you hot and bothered:
  • 7:30 PM start at the Phone Booth. An epic moment in that yours truly and HF33 will be attending the game together. I am drinking already to warm up;
  • Since that 3-0 embarassment, Habs are 3-0-1 and the Sens have lost 2 of 3, including Saturday night to their own kryptonite, the Leafs;
  • Of course, SLC of Five for Smiting and Sherry of Scarlett Ice have all your Sens-ly goodness;
  • Spezza and Heatley playing well, 8 and 7 points respectively in their last 5 games. Big surprise;
  • Kovy and Big Tits looking good lately for the Habs, ever since I questioned them;
  • Ever since I didn't mention it, Habs injuries are piling up. DOOM out 3 weeks with a lower body injury, Gui! day-t0-day with a neck injury. Wow, "neck" is very specific for an NHL roster report;
  • These game previews are obviously more powerful than I thought;
  • And let's end on this: if the Habs win (ha!) we clinch a playoff spot. Double Ha!
So is it wrong to be drinking at noon? Discuss.

UPDATE - Just learned that RDS.ca will finally broadcast games on the Web, starting tonight! That's the good news. The bad news is that it costs $2.99. WTF?

43 comments:

  1. Motion to Amend: (is that right? I don't know lawyer-y syntax)

    That the final bullet point in today's game preview and open thread, pursuant to said thread's opening paragraph, should state unequivocally and without prejudice that the Habs have zero chance of winning tonight, and thereby clinching a playoff spot.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is it wrong to be at un club de danseuses nues at 12pm?

    ~ moeman

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Sport Illustrated Jinx has worn off on your blog.'
    As soon as you mention the lack of injuries on the team, the Habs' start dropping like flies.
    Can you be more specific next time and mention how healthy Slowinski is looking these days. With any luck, he'll gone for the playoffs too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous - and my God that Breezer is a PARAGON of health and well-being, especially for someone so old and shitty.

    *crosses fingers and searches for lead pipe*

    ReplyDelete
  5. Your reverse psychology has every chance of working beautifully! (See what I did there?)

    Seriously, if it helps, I am not feeling very good about our chances at all. Not that that will stop me from dancing naked by the light of the full moon if we win, mind you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh, and drinking at noon is totally acceptable, especially on game days. Or special occasions. Or board meetings. Wait, what?

    ReplyDelete
  7. There's nothing wrong with drinking at noon! Great blog, I stumbled on it about a month ago, very entertaining! I will be at the game tonight myself (I started drinking at 3 though, so I have a while to catch up!)

    ReplyDelete
  8. welcome Shawn. thanks to you and SLC for your support of my noontime drinking. and thanks to moeman, next time at noon i move the party to a strip club. awesome.

    ReplyDelete
  9. For RDS, I don't understand why everyone doesn't just order it for $6.99 a month. I live in Ontario and I get every Habs game, plus I know people in Alberta who get RDS and therefore every Habs game the same way I do. You can even cancel RDS in the off-season if you want. It costs close to $6.99 a beer at most strip clubs.

    ReplyDelete
  10. alright im off to the game! i'll report back on the 4-1 loss later

    be excellent to each other

    ReplyDelete
  11. it's 5 o'clock somewhere, right? My captain always says "just wait until it hits double digits and you're off duty." Noon is totally fine!

    ReplyDelete
  12. W000!! Great work by both Laps & Higgins there. We're probably still going to lose, but this is definitely fun.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 3-0. Good, another two goals and I might start to feel comfortable.

    Go Hockey.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wow. Thats for being unfaithful 29...

    Mad Max is being a pain in the ass tonight. Ans Saku is relly playing well!

    3 lines really making things happen. Hope it will last for more than 20 minutes ! *jinx

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hopefully the Habs remember that the Senators have outplayed them most of the season and keep focused.

    A five goal lead would be swell,
    but I'll settle for less
    to crack Ottawa's shell,
    and leave 'em a mess.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The Habs in the Spring
    My eyes deceive me once more
    The Sens are losing!

    ReplyDelete
  17. 4-1. We must be in the Twilight Zone.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yet another goal
    in Emery's hole.
    And Spezza looks like a mole.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Ask and ye shall receive, fezworth.

    What a turnaround - so far.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Wow! I am impressed beyond any poor rhymes. Grabovski, Kostopoulos, Bouillon and Markov, I salute you.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Epic victory
    The snow rests still on the ground
    Yet we'll play in June

    ReplyDelete
  22. I usually only come over here on Thursdays, but I have to comment on this game. It's kind of spectacular to have a game like this...even though I like the Sens. Oh well, Go Habs.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Fucking go fucking hockey. Yes.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Is Monday officially haiku night? It seems to be bringing the Canadiens good luck. :)

    ReplyDelete
  25. Damn. They've started again,
    Those Senator men.
    Now we'll see if Fezworth's lead
    is all we need.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hah! Had been rhyming to keep my mind active in ad breaks. Not counting syllables.

    (But notice that I started again when they scored two goals.)

    Price fait les arrets,
    et Le Canadien continue a tete.

    (not sure that translates as I hope.)

    ReplyDelete
  27. What...The...Fuck!
    If you can't hold a 6 goal lead in the third late in the season, just fold...

    ReplyDelete
  28. Fuckity fuck. Wow. Apparently you need 7 goals to put away the Sens.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Yes, holding leads seems to be their problem this season! But it's better than tailing and making unlikely 3rd period comebacks.

    3 goal lead, 3 goals in 10 minutes, and 10 minutes to go.

    Price's rebounds are big tonight..

    ReplyDelete
  30. Mick McGeough, or however you spel his name, can go to hell.

    ReplyDelete
  31. And now a penalty. Exactly what the Sens need. But watching them trying the comeback is pretty entertaining - this is the kind of opposition we can expect in playoffs, not weak, folding teams.

    A fifth goal by Ottawa
    could be deadly.
    But the Habs's K's
    are the KO medley.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Jesus...this is killing me, get it together boys!

    ReplyDelete
  33. So, some rookie mistakes, but generally still very impressive. I've gotten so habituated to watching the Habs fly that when they skate in at a more 'normal' speed they look slow. They still look very dangerous although a few seem a little unsure.

    Emery's an ass,
    but that too, will pass.

    ReplyDelete
  34. My God...Why the fuck does this have to be a white knuckle game???
    A 7-1 lead squandered, fuck me.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Great win... however clearly, there's fodder for the pessimists. How in in the name of Jumping Jehosefat did we lost such a lead. Ridiculous. I can understand letting off the gas a bit with a 6-goal lead, but really... that's a bit silly!

    ReplyDelete
  36. The same reason Begin was on ice towards the end of the game. It's a learning experience - leads don't mean victory because the other team can still come back. Six goals though, are better than three (Rangers) or five (Montreal's comeback against the Rangers).

    But don't count on the lead for the victory. It still takes work.

    We had it the easy way tonight!

    ReplyDelete
  37. Carbos smile at the end of the game said it all.....

    don't get too cocky guys, its a good way to learn a lesson. We deserved this win but it would have been much sweeter at 7-1 not 7-5 don't you think?

    ReplyDelete
  38. i leave the open thread for one night and a poetry slam breaks out. very creative!

    well fuck. that 3rd period just wouldn't allow me and 33 to really enjoy ourselves.

    but still, playoffs! that's something

    ReplyDelete
  39. The poetry slam in here was classic! Kudos to all!

    Is it wrong that I'm actually HAPPY with the way this game turned out? Had we kicked their asses 7-1 at the end of it, I don't think we would have learned as valuable a lesson. NEVER. FUCKING. STOP. PLAYING.

    I think that the fact that Mick McGeough stopped calling penalties against the guys in white helps us not get too cocky over this game.

    That being said - W00T! We chicken winged on their sorry asses!! Yeah!!

    And kudos as well to the HLA (wrestling reference) line for getting the game winning goal. Tits Grabs Tits indeed...

    ReplyDelete
  40. Lesson taught tonight;
    Play sixty minutes per game
    or win bittersweet.

    Learn quickly young Habs;
    for play like that in april
    angers the Hockey Gods.

    To express oneself
    in seventeen syllables
    is very diffic.

    morning skate completely Haiku !

    ReplyDelete

think before you post. or don't. we don't give a fuck.

comments MUST include either profane language, links to pornography, or a reference to the Leafs or Bruins sucking.

If you want to create a clickable link, use this tag, replacing the square brackets with < and >:

[a href="http://www.URLtolinkto.com"]Text to display[/a]

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.